One thing I'm wondering about when it comes to the whole proportions thing: I get how it is important to have a sense for proportions when it comes to drawings from the front/back/side without any extraordinary perspectives. However, as soon we begin to draw in perspective, these proportion guidelines become distorted. So how do we use these landmarks in perspective?

@Michael Hampton I like this version of the map a bit better than Loomis' version for proportion. Simpler and easier to remember. A couple questions on the legs: (I know they weren't covered and it's not about skeleton properly) Loomis puts the width of the lower legs at the calves at about a head wide. Where would you place the ankle bones? Loomis doesn't seem to explicitly say but looks like around 1/3 up from the heels. would you say the same for these? Quick question about the base of the neck in front and back view. I noticed that the back of the neck in front view isn't as high as it is the back view. Was that just an oversight? Should the first subdivision of the second segment of the body be divided into halves twice to get the back edge or is the back view incorrectly placed and should be lower at that first halving like in the front view?

Whenever I'm drawing the rib part, it kinda goes a bit roundish, making it a bit bulky, so i redraw it many times. Other than that i'm getting a hang of it. having fun!

Proportion and landmarks.

Had a blast with this once again :D Super fun.

Is there a jpeg or psd file you can share that shares the landmarks you did as a template for reference? Screen capping the lecture again and again is a bit hard XD

sir in anatomy we study that for male shoulder area would be a bit broder then pelvis and for female we study that pelvis would broder then shoulder. based on this chapter how can we make that rule in practise here ?

Two things: Any tips on accurate head shapes? If I make the head too skinny or wide early on, the rest of the body will have the wrong width. Second, we seem to be missing the part for the legs. This was very helpful and the top half of the body is definitely the most complicated, but I feel like it's still important to have the rough lengths of the legs included here. It looks like some folks may have already known these proportions or got the rest of this from the book?

Should we be able to draw this from memory?

thought I’d share these here, need to work on my draftsmanship I think

I wanted to try this again, I'm trying to relearn proportions and landmarks so that I have a better time with my figures.

I tried to follow along but it got a bit messy. I think my head was too wide to start and I needed readjust things. This was very helpful though. I am going to start practicing breaking down individual parts in the way you showed. Side note once you add the spine to the ribcage it kind of reminds me of a popsicle or a sign.

I followed along, and a lot of this just made so much sense. The "1/2 & 1/3" system is such a nice simplification of what usually feels like a daunting thing.

My 1st attempt at this exercise and one I definitely will return to for further improvement. Although I was not looking forward to doing something ' scientific ' I really enjoyed doing this and I can sense the benefits going forward.

Might need to do this assignment again at a large scale to get a better feel for the human proportions. What do you think?

Proportions is still something that haunts me when it comes to fundamentals, I'll most likely come back to this with the rest of the parts. using your book as reference.

I was paying attention. I swear! I might have forgot the legs.

Proportions notes. I noticed that this explanation of proportions isn't in the book. Are there any major changes in how you teach the constructive approach from when you first wrote the book until now?

Very easy to understad.