Activity Feed
added comment inNeed a critique! (Feedback)
These are tricky but you're doing a good job. On that last pose, her shoulders are protracted so that will increase the width of the top of the box. She's also rounding her back as she's protracting her shoulders. I think your drawing is pretty accurate, it looks like you're showing a bit too much of the top plane of the pelvis box. This is how I would solve it.
@michaelbrixx
1mo
I appreciate it so much! I literally sat for an hour drawing and redrawing that pose and couldn’t crack it. This is so helpful .
@michaelbrixx
•
1mo
Asked for help
I would especially like help about the last pose. I have no idea how to draw that one. In the end I got frustrated and just went with what you see there, but it doesn’t feel right, can someone assist?
Hello. I made a New Year’s resolution to draw more this year. Right now I’m on the robo bean exercise. I need some feedback on my current ones I have attempted. What can I do better? What’s not working? Feedback is appreciated!
Shelley Plunkett
•
1yr
I think they all look good except the last pelvis may have too much of an anterior tilt, she looks a little more upright than yours, but NOT by much.
I see where you're coming from!I tried to exaggerate the form but I guess I might have went overboard. Thank you for the feedback!
loes roos
•
1yr
Not sure completely, but I feel that with the ladies you give them a bottom part that is about twice as thick as their chest (no breasts included). I think that in this model the width of the back and the width of the pelvis area (not adding too much of the buttocks yet) is nearly the same. The waist is thinner.
Thank you for the feedback! So I guess I need to make my drawings more proportionally accurate? I guess since Stan said in the tutorial videos that "The pelvis on a female model is wider than the males" I took that advice and ran with it. I felt like I needed to properly display the difference in models, but I went overboard. I will try and draw the proportions more accurate to the reference itself!
Steve Lenze
•
1yr
These are actually pretty good. The one thing you need to pay attention to is how wide some of the planes are, in particular with the pelvis. Also, make sure you are accounting for the tilts forward or backwards of the torso.
I did some sketches to show you what I mean, I hope it helps :)
Thank you so much! I think that is what has felt “wrong” for me! I felt like I wasn’t fully capturing the forms and now I can see why, i appreciate it!
Hello, I’ve been doing some robo beans and I need feedback. They just don’t feel right to me. I’m mostly concerned about the angles of my pelvises, are they correct? Should I exaggerate these forms more? Is the perspectives of the boxes correct? Feedback is definitely appreciated!
Hello! I recently got a drawing tablet and did the landmarks assignment in the figure drawing course.
i only focused on the landmarks themselves and didn’t bother with anatomy since this is a figure drawing course. Could I get feedback on my landmark placements?
Steve Lenze
•
2yr
Hey michaelbrixx,
I did some quick sketches to show you some of the things that I noticed in your drawings. Mostly, you need to focus on the corners and structure of your ribcage and pelvis. I hope this is helpful :)
Thank you! I focused to hard on making ny drawings look exactly like the references! I have moved on to the robo bean to learn more about the structure of the pelvis and torso, I’m hoping my errors here will be improved with the knowledge I will learn in this next lesson, thank you for the feedback, I’ll be back for more drawings soon!
