Hi Ria, I haven't done the hamstrings yet, so I will critique the adductors. From your reply, I think you understand them very well now, so feel free to ignore my critique. I'm pretty sure that in your first tracing, the forms you are indicating as gracilis are actually the add. magnus and gracilis merged into one form. Sartorius shouldn't be visible from this angle, except from the knee area, where it flows around the vastus medialis, to attach on the tibia (the big bundle of tendons is actually visible here, so the sartorius would be in the front there, behind it would be the gracilis, and behind it are the hamstrings). The add. magnus attaches to the femur, so the gracilis will overlap it at the knee, in order to join the tendon bundle. The adductor muscle that is medial to the hamstrings is the add.magnus. Gracilis is medial to the add. magnus. You have it as gracilis in your 3rd tracing (the one on his left leg), but it is actually the add.magnus. In your 2nd, 3rd and 4rth tracing you forgot the add. magnus, between the hamstrings and the gracilis. It should be a little wedge-like form, like the one you drew on the 3rd tracing-his right leg , but a little bit longer. When the muscle is not stretched, it will be like a wedge, because it is covered by the hamstrings. If stretched, it will continue, until its insertion on the distal femur. Best of luck with your anatomy studies :)

Fantastic job!