Activity Feed
Felicia N
•
3yr
added comment inIllustration for personal project.
That area is distracting and competing with your main subjects since it has the same range of values in a significant portion. It doesn't lead the eye to main focus but almost traps you there and leads you outside.
Some thumbnails are in order to figure out a way to make it darker, maybe exploring a combination of moving where the trees end on that side and position of fire and how it shines on your characters. For example pushing that side of trees further back they'd catch less light. Imagine if it was near the back leg of the tiger, it could have some (subtler) warm light that would lead you to the focal point. Just cutting vertically up to the end of the part of the illuminated tree already feels more resolved.
Atharva Lotake
3yr
This is the final image! I hope you like it. Any other feedback would be appreciated as well! Have a good day!
Atharva Lotake
3yr
Thank you soo much for the feedback. ill check back soon with the improved version!
@raeterrific
•
3yr
I am absolutely baffled by how everybody here is going from pictures of real people to these stylized bendy cartoon versions. He just draws lines like they're obvious but... I can't figure out how they connect to the person he's supposedly looking at. Often the finished product looks cool but at best like a vague approximation of the original. And the photos he's referencing are all very slim and in very unrealistic positions, which seems like the best possible starting point. He's got the message up about "motion not contour" and I'm just continuing to stare at this going, you're drawing a person in a single position from a still photograph, nothing is moving! There is no motion! Or talking about using a C curve instead of a straight line to draw something that clearly isn't the spine to make it look "relaxed" when the woman in the photo is laying in what is clearly a very uncomfortable position and not at all visibly relaxed.
It feels like there's a missing "and draw the rest of the owl" part of this explanation for me, but apparently other people are getting it? Is my brain broken or something? Has anybody had this kind of problem and found other explanations that make it click?
Try to do the pose yourself. It will feel a certain way, pay attention to how different parts of your body feel - maybe in some areas you feel your muscles stretching, or that some part is supporting a lot of weight, or some joint is locked, muscles flexed or relaxed, some part maybe is bent in an awkward way. Grab a mental image of what impression you have of the pose - the important parts that stand out. Now you want to come across to the viewer that impression in a few lines - you won't represent everything. You pick only the highlights, just the bits that tell what you want to come across. With that will come some exaggeration in some parts and omissions in others - you might prefer to use a curve instead of a straight line or a sharp angle instead of a curve if that says more about the overall pose.
I suspect part of your confusion is because this is not an easy exercise, it's hard to be deliberate while not fully in control of the tool. But just like while learning to speak a foreign language, the mere exercise of it will help to get better at saying precisely what you want to say even if at the beginning you might grab whatever words you remember to get your point across.
I hope this somehow helps, but if confuses you more please throw it in the bin ;)
Felicia N
•
3yr
You mentioned you don't use solvent to clean your brushes, but only clean them with soap - so I assume at the end. So how do you deal with that during a painting session to avoid colour/value contamination?
Felicia N
•
3yr
Hello everyone!
Steven, you showed us some studies that lead to the current drawing. So, when starting this one, to what level of degree do you have it planned versus left to chance?
Also, is it harder to draw in this setting, while talking at the same time?
