Hi there! I think you did a good job on the structural, mannequinization part :) The underlying simple forms you used to express the anatomy are readable and solid in most places. Only area that to me looks like you didnt really think about constructing it three-dimensionally is her left thigh. The overall form of the upper leg isnt clear anymore, instead you have two complex organic forms that arent easy to comprehend. Maybe try showing the anterior and lateral planes of the upper leg's box a little better with your cross contour lines. The plane change should be visible. Right now, it looks like youre using the s-curve between rec. femoris and add.s as plane change, which doesnt make sense (try imagining a shaded version of this form: it wouldnt look real). All other critique I have for this drawing is regarding line quality and proportion: Especially in the hips the individual forms are hard to read. I think you did construct them well enough, but because of all your cross-contour and x-ray lines having the same strength as the lines seperating the forms the latter are harder to find. You designed the lower legs and esp. the ankles to be unnaturally thin. If thats what youre going for, take heed that both lower legs have the same proportions. Her left lower leg feels a little thinner even than the right. Maybe that's just because the medial portion of that leg's gastrocnemius is too small/ ends too high. Her right leg is about 1 cu longer in your drawing than her left. For me at least it looks like that because I feel that her right toes are touching the ground which would mean that both legs have the same distance to the viewer. Of all of these points there werent really any major complaints, I think youve made a structurally and anatomically solid drawing. Maybe youll find it helpful to re-do this exercise sometimes while thinking of even simpler forms and then adding anatomy "on top". Thats always a good idea, anyway. Have fun drawing and until next time!